Subject	It looks like it would easily twist the dowel
Posted by	AzHeat on March 30, 2006 at 2:15 PM
	This message has been viewed 20 times.
In Reply To	Why? What's wrong w. them? (n/m) posted by YugoBernie (NoVA) on March 30, 2006 at 02:10 PM
Message	off from torquing and from the scheer stress. Instead of having a solid peace you put a thick washer that makes it two pieces ( the washer and the cam). Doesn't seem strong .
Follow Ups	Late model cam gears 94+ vs. 90-93 - AzHeat 13:36:16 03/30/06 Re: Late model cam gears 94+ vs. 90-93 - Dallas DamonZ 13:40:51 03/30/06 Here's a pic.. - Woody75 (Denver) 13:46:28 03/30/06 Is one cam "better" then the other? (n/m) - RedBeauty84zx (San Antonio) 13:48:40 03/30/06 only if you plan on adjusting the gears (n/m) - 93silverTT 14:04:15 03/30/06 I have the JWT adapters, they look like crappy - AzHeat 14:05:38 03/30/06 Why? What's wrong w. them? (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 14:10:59 03/30/06 It looks like it would easily twist the dowel - AzHeat 14:15:42 03/30/06 While it doesn't "seem strong", JWT is confident in it as a - YugoBernie (NoVA) 14:17:41 03/30/06 bah - aliaZ 15:17:42 03/30/06 I just used pliers to remove the pins. (n/m) - Woody75 (Denver) 14:18:46 03/30/06 you didn't have to heat up the front end of the cam? - AzHeat 14:30:21 03/30/06 Nope. Pulled them out of a few sets now. (n/m) - Woody75 (Denver) 14:33:14 03/30/06 look like the ner can be modified into an adjustable sprock- - SpecNATT (Houston) 19:51:50 03/30/06 No VTC on the 96 cars. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 13:57:02 03/30/06
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.